Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): In Memoriam: Czesław Martyniak
Articles

Axiological Problems of Statutory Interpretation

Artur Kotowski
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw (Poland)
Bio
Published 9.11.2020
Keywords
  • statutory interpretation,
  • axiology,
  • theory and philosophy of the law,
  • morality,
  • theory of legal interpretation
How to Cite
Kotowski, A. (2020). Axiological Problems of Statutory Interpretation. The Legal Culture, 2(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.37873/legal.2019.2.1.56

Abstract

The paper discusses the question of axiological determinants of statutory interpretation in the context of statutory law. The author formulates the argument that the paradigm of the so-called non-axiological statutory interpretation, originating from the non-axiological jurisprudence approach, does not offer an effective protection against obtaining meanings which are contrary to elementary moral rules. The paper focuses on axiological instructions for an interpreter, i.e. how to look for morally objective meanings and what the moral objectivity criteria of meaning in the law are.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bator A, Sulikowski A, and Pulka Z, ‘Czy koniec teorii prawa?’ [Is This the End of the Theory of Law?] (2011) 312(3337) Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Prawo 13
  2. Bell J, Cross R, and Engle G, Statutory Interpretation (Butterworths 1995)
  3. Bennion F, Statutory Interpretation (2nd edn, Butterworths 1992)
  4. Bix B, ‘Radbruch's Formula and Conceptual Analysis’ (2011) 56 American Journal of Jurisprudence 2011) 45, Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-13 <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2017942> accessed 18 October 2020
  5. Bunikowski D, Values and Axiology in the European Union Legal System In Context of The European Culture and the Constitution for Europe. Why does the EU need the axiology? <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303971870> accessed 16 October 2020
  6. Carnap R, Pisma semantyczne [Semantic Papers] (T. Ciecierski and others trs, Aletheia 2007)
  7. Cerar M, ‘The Ideology of the Rule of Law’ (2011) 97 ARSP Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
  8. Dudek M, ‘Instrumentalization [Exploitation] of the Law and Neutralization of Values in Law. Some Reflections after Reading the Draft Amendments of the Special Part of Polish Penal Code of the Sixth Term of Office of the Polish Sejm (2007-2011)’ in Pałecki K (ed), Neutralization of Values in Law (LEX a Wolters Kluwer business 2013)
  9. Dziedziak W, ‘Axiological Basis for the Application of Law - a Perspective of the Equitable Law’ (2015) 24(2) Studia Iuridica Lubliniensia 49
  10. Easterbrook FR, ‘The Absence of Method in Statutory Interpretation’ (2017) 84 The University of Chicago Law Review 81, <https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5986&context=uclrev> accessed 16 October 2020
  11. Giaro T, ‘Roman Law Always Dies with a Codification’ in Dębiński A and Jońca M (eds), Roman Law and European Legal Culture (Lublin 2008)
  12. Grabowski A, ‘Clara non sunt interpretanda vs. omnia sunt interpretanda: A Never-ending Controversy in Polish Legal Theory?’ (2015) 27 Revus [Online] <http://revus.revues.org/3326>, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.3326> accessed 18 October 2020
  13. Grzybowski T, Zirk-Sadowski M, Argumentum a Contrario (2017) 72(11) Państwo i Prawo
  14. Hart HLA, Pojęcie prawa [The Concept of Law] (J. Woleński tr, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN 1998)
  15. Heideman RD, ‘Legalizing Hate: The Significance of the Nuremberg Laws and the Post-War Nuremberg Trials’ (2017) 39(5) Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review <http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1729&context=ilr> accessed 18 October 2020
  16. Neubert A and Shreve GM, Translation as Text (The Kent State University Press 1992)
  17. Rabault H, Granice wykładni sędziowskiej [Borders of Judicial Interpretation] (B Janicka tr, Scholar 1997)
  18. Radbruch G, Ustawa i Prawo (Zajadło J tr) [2002] Ius et Lex 157 <https://www.law.uj.edu.pl/users/kprz/docs/radbruch%20ustawa_i_prawo.pdf> accessed 18 October 2020
  19. Stelmach J, Pozytywistyczne mity metody prawniczej [Positivist Myths of the Legal Method] (2012) 3(11) Forum Prawnicze
  20. Stychin CF, Mulcahy L, Legal Methods and Systems (4th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2010)
  21. Tebbit M, Philosophy of Law. An Introduction (3rd edn, Routledge 2017)
  22. Varga C, The Paradigms of Legal Thinking (Szent Istvan Tarsulat 2012)
  23. Veitch S, Moral Conflict and Legal Reasoning (Hart Publishing 1999)
  24. Vencatasamy L, The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions accessed 16 October 2020
  25. Waśkowski E, Teoria wykładni prawa cywilnego. Metodologja dogmatyki cywilistycznej w zarysie [Theory of Interpretation of the Civil Law. Civil Law Methodology – an Outline] (Izba Adwokacka w Warszawie 1936)
  26. Zeppos NS, The Use of Authority in Statutory Interpretation: An Empirical Analysis (1992) 70(5) Texas Law Review